Thursday, 17 September 2009
Can you Crowdsource Vision?
Thursday, 18 June 2009
Appendix C: The Dream of the LSM Project Group
We dream of a church in which…
we are all followers of
the Way of Jesus who are -
living in the presence of God;
serving Christ with one another;
taking part in the Mission of God in the World…
we are all active in the
ministry of Christ –
being his body in a broken creation;
building one another up for works of service;
fulfilling his call in the midst of daily life…
we are empowered and
driven by the Spirit –
who fills us with gifts and guidance;
who leads us out into new territory;
helping us to develop new expressions of faith and community…
we serve together in
collaborative and mutual ministry –
each member an active participant,
according to their gifts and calling;
leadership exercised by the whole body acting as one…
all forms of ministry are recognised
and given space to grow –
ministries of loving service;
ministries which walk with others in the territory of the Holy;
ministries of connection, oversight and vision…
Servant Leadership is exercised so that
those in positions of authority
encourage and support the ministry of others,
coordination, facilitation and empowerment
are more important than power and control,
and each member is nurtured, trained and supported
as a valuable member of the team…
the local church is valued
because God meets us
in relationship, community
and a need for “home”
and blesses each community
with the resources it needs
to be Christ’s body;
creating space where human beings
can encounter God…
the wider church is valued
because it exists
to make local ministry possible,
and unites us in fellowship
with people of God
in every time and place…
hope will always overcome fear,
because we are not obsessed
with failure,
competition or even survival,
but continually draw onwards
as faithful pilgrims,
who experience growth,
transformation and new life…
We will work towards this vision…
with fresh and inherited
expressions of church;
as listeners, partners,
mentors and companions;
by reflecting on the voice of God
in the stories we tell…
We dream of a church…
Home - Back - Next
Thursday, 4 June 2009
lss?
1. The term "Local Shared Ministry" is in use by some projects with a very particular definition as to what LSM might be defined as. Within our ecumenical and postmodern urban context we are very wary of "master plans" and "grand/meta narratives". We therefore want to be organic, fluid and bottom up - which means that we have decided not to go for some of the more structured approaches that LSM might suggest.
2. When we capitalise "Local Shared Ministry" or "LSM" it implies a very specific "brand name" or scheme. While we do have a project group and some fairly sophisticated strategic thoughts, we are also conscious that we are observing and encouraging a phenomenon or tendency in the western church, rather than necessarily creating it. If we were to use a lower case this may help indicate this.
3. We have also noted that there are three elements in our minds: a) locally derived ministry, b) shared ministry and leadership and c) support for ministry in terms of oversight, empowerment and mentoring. I have often thought it would be nice if we could reflect this in our language...
So, I'd like to suggest that (in Milton Keynes) Local Shared Ministry becomes local shared and supported ministry - and if you really need initials you could call it lss.
That's my mad idea of the day...
Tuesday, 5 May 2009
Finance Sponsiring Board
Tuesday, 21 April 2009
Tuesday
At the LSM Project Group we agreed that it is time to widen the conversation...
Wednesday, 11 February 2009
LSM Mini-Conference
- Mapping existing collaborative ministry patterns in churches and partnerships - The LSM Project Group will determine a list of questions.
- Denominational Possibilities - We will attempt to produce a spreadsheet/grid which identifies what is possible within the five denominations. The LSM Project Group will determine what categories will be included.
- Theologies - We will also look at various theologies which define why we do things - from denominational and post-denominational perspectives
- Recognition - We will discuss appropriate ways for denominations (and others) to recognise and approve LSM communities at various stages of their journey - this will include work on a potential "covenant service" to celebrate the launch of "a new ministry".
- Companion - following our discussions today we have more material to help us in the creation of a job description for companions - Alison will follow this up.
- Passing on the idea - There is still a great deal to do to look at how a community will continue its development with consistency and vision as individuals come and go...
- Case Studies - We want to look at some real world examples and see what we can learn - we did play with a couple in the afternoon which helped identify potential issues...
- The New Zealand Model - this is becoming a piece of unhelpful baggage which is blocking the ability of people to hear what we are saying. We need to make it clear that the MK "brand" is different from the model we initially explored...
- Presidents - when we next report we will be presenting out "What is LSM?" document. We may need to request an opportinuity for a few of us to meet the presidents - particularly to discuss the approval/recognition issue...
Sunday, 18 January 2009
St Frideswide's

Peter Green presided and I preached.
The readings were Revelation 5:1-10 and John 1:43-end. These were great reading for thinking about the mission of Christ which was:
a) Truly local - since the incarnation implies a full immersion into the socio-economic and cultural identity of the community with whom God chooses to dwell.
b) Essential collaborative - since Jesus depends on other people both to share good news and act on his behalf.
c) Ultimately universal - since the kingdom of God stretches out through all times and places.
In other words, this was a good occasion to talk about Local Shared Ministry...
Sunday, 30 November 2008
All Saints MK Village
Monday, 10 November 2008
Local Ministry
Like most conferences, the interesting bits happen between the sessions and I was particularly interested to meet someone from Liverpool who had already read this blog. The wonders of the internet!

The explicit domain relates to the visible church and the way that this expression is managed. Although she was clear that this is an aspect of church which she loves, she also questioned the amount of time and resource that we give to it.
The foundational domain relates to the basic experience of human beings on the very edge of faith. This is where we relate to those who have no eplicit theology or belief and may encounter the divine but struggle to articulate the experience. The role of the church in this domain is not to impose its own understanding but to acompany and encourage those who are feeling the first stirings of an understanding that there is something other... In this domain, she suggested, chaplains have traditionally walked...
She discussed the concept of "church centres" where churches make their fascilities open to the community as a resource. She suggested that this "gift" has not always been helpful since there is often no attempt to build relationships or create meaning. To counter this she suggested that we explore the concept of "community chaplains" - trained volunteers who would spend time making links and befriending the groups who use "church centres". This seems a good idea. I did ask and no-one had produced any training, so this idea would need quite a bit of work... It's not a bad one though and may be worth looking at in MK. We have a variety of "community centre" churches which generate frustration, disapointment and can be a drain on resources. It strikes me that the concept of Community Chaplains could turn these places into potential community hubs...
The third domain is the vocational. This is the aspect of our life where individuals experience the discomfort of "should I? could I?" in response to need and possibility. Ann wasn't sure this had anything to do with Local Ministry but I suspect it does - local churches should be places where disciples are nurtured and groups of people challenge each other to have a go...
She also talked about communal anxiety, power, status and control - and so on... She's a great speaker and gave everyone a great deal to think about...
Beyond the talks this conference has given me an opportunity to ask some questions and find out what's going on around the CofE. It's a mixed picture... One of the questions I've been keen to ask has been about "commisioning" services for local ministry teams. There seem to be a huge variety of patterns and few commonalities. Even the names used vary dramatically! From an MK point of view, I increasingly think that we will have to create our own...
In the evening I was asked to talk about Water Eaton. It was interesting to get some feedback from proper experts which both confirmed some of my thoughts and raised some important questions.
Thursday, 6 November 2008
What is Local Shared Ministry?
Local Shared Ministry in
What is Local Shared Ministry?
Local Shared Ministry (LSM) is an approach to ministry characterised by three main features:
Local: The emphasis is on the ministry of local Christians who are called, trained, authorised and supported to serve God in their local church and community.
Shared: Lay and ordained Christians share their calling, training, leadership and ministry within mutually supportive teams.
Enabled: Local teams and churches are supported, trained, guided and equipped by the wider church.
Local Shared Ministry (sometimes called Mutual Ministry or Total Ministry) emphasises the importance of locally derived ministry – with the wider church providing support, training and authorisation. In places where it has been developed (including
In Auckland Diocese churches are offered the possibility whenever there is a vacancy. Once a church has expressed an interest there is a process of discernment, reflection, training and authorisation which leads to the establishment of a local licensed ministry team which includes lay and ordained people with a variety of different roles. A Ministry Enabler is appointed (quarter time) to support this team in their ongoing development. The church is therefore only expected to pay a quarter of a stipend.
The concept of Local Shared Ministry has a certain attraction in
In
1. Ecumenical: We’re committed to working ecumenically. This is a very challenging commitment since it means we need to work with a number of different denominational systems, ecclesiologies and patterns of ministry.
2. Organic Development: In some places there is a ‘master plan’ which includes a commitment to Local Shared Ministry. In
3. Project Group: We have set up an ecumenical project group to encourage and support the development of Local Shared Ministry across
4. Communities: We are concentrating on ‘communities’ who are working towards Local Shared Ministry. These communities may be churches, congregations, partnerships, parishes, fresh expressions or missionary groups. We want to encourage and support these communities as they develop.
5. Supervisors and Companions: In
Local Shared Ministry is:
A Dream: It’s a vision for how the Church might be.
A Framework: It’s a set of tools, processes and structures which are there to encourage and support the vision. See the diagram below.
A Journey: It’s a continuing process of walking with God and one another as we explore his call and his mission.
The most common model for churches in the western world is for there to be a single minister or leadership team. These people are the ‘leaders’ or ‘ministers’. Local Shared Ministry is not about setting up a team to support or share ministry with the priest or pastor; it is about recognising that each member is called to be a minister and to share leadership with the whole community.
Some people like to see the designated leaders or ministers as the people at the bottom of a pyramid – supporting those who are doing the real work of the Church in the world. Although this is a wonderful idea, it is not what Local Shared Ministry is about. In Local Shared Ministry all members share the responsibility for supporting one another and acting as ministers in the Church and in the wider world.
Local Shared Ministry requires each person to look to Christ as the head of the Church. LSM communities are mutually supportive groups in which each person seeks to follow Christ as members of one body.
In practice, there may be particular individuals who are called to do certain functions within the community. Some may be set aside for sacramental ministry or to preach. Others may be called to coordinate or facilitate the life of the body. These special functions are always seen as subsets of membership rather than a matter of status or power.
1. Ministering Communities
In a Local Shared Ministry community each person is aware that they are part of a ministering community, rather than members of a community gathered around a minister. In other words a Local Shared Ministry community includes lay and ordained people who are all active in service as fellow disciples. In a Local Shared Ministry community all are members, all are ministers and all are leaders.
Local Shared Ministry is not about filling the gaps left because there may be fewer paid or stipendiary ministers. It is about a different way of being Church.
2. Responding to God’s Call
In a Local Shared Ministry community each person is aware that they are called by God for some form of ministry. This ministry might involve work in the Church but it is equally likely to involve service in the wider world – or a combination of the two.
For instance, one person may feel that they are called to serve God as a shop assistant, banker, social worker or teacher. The LSM community would recognise this as their main ministry and would pray for them and seek to support them in this work. Within the Church they would still regard themselves as a minister rather than a ‘passenger’ and act accordingly. This may be reflected in the way they encourage or support others.
Someone else may feel a calling to preach and would be trained and supported in this ministry. Working with others they would learn how to exercise this ministry alongside their everyday life and work.
Within the community there may also be an ordained priest who feels a particular call to work with older people or to campaign on environmental issues. The community would explore this with them and may encourage them in this work rather than expect them to exercise a general ministry.
Local Shared Ministry is not about turning lay people into mini-ministers but about recognising that God calls us all to follow him in a range of different ways.
In practice this will mean that there are regular opportunities for people to explore new ministries or for the community to discover how God may be calling each member.
In some Local Shared Ministry communities there will be discernment processes during which each member is asked to prayerfully nominate people who they feel are called to particular forms of ministry; for example, pastoral care, preaching, practical action, evangelism or priesthood. These names are put forward during worship and those who are nominated are then interviewed by a team who attempt to discern how God may be calling these people. Those who are called to preaching or priesthood may also be required to go through the selection processes chosen by their denomination.
There might also be processes, courses or events which provide members with an opportunity to review their call – to think of tasks and roles that they may need to lay down, as well as new callings which they may need to take up.
Using discernment processes on a regular basis, and by encouraging each person to continually review their call, the community will grow and develop in local ministry.
3.
Local Shared Ministry communities understand that the purpose of the Church is to join God in his mission throughout creation. They are rooted in local communities or networks and are capable of identifying needs and opportunities to which they are willing to respond.
In practice the community may choose to carry out a mission audit from time to time looking carefully at the needs of the wider world and seeking to find ways of responding in loving action.
Their understanding of mission will be broad and they will continually be seeking God in prayer as they attempt to discern what God is saying to them about their purpose and call.
The five marks of mission may provide a helpful set of criteria for analysing the mission of the LSM community. In fact the community may wish to use these as part of an annual review.
The Five Marks of · to proclaim the good news of the Kingdom · to teach, baptise and nurture new believers · to respond to human need by loving service · to seek to transform unjust structures of society · to strive to safeguard the integrity of creation and to sustain the life of the earth |
4. Interdependence
Local Shared Ministry communities are not dependent on the work of paid ministers who exercise ministry on their behalf. In fact, they believe that God has already given them everything they need in order to answer his call. They just need to identify where these resources are. There may already be people in the community who have the necessary gifts, or the community may need to find the right partners to work with.
For example, a church or community may feel that they need more pastoral support for housebound people. They would not assume that this should be the responsibility of a stipendiary minister (assuming that they have one) but would discuss this issue as a community and attempt to identify people who may be called to this work. They would also talk things through with others and find out if training is available through their denomination or partners. They might also investigate the possibility that there are other groups, churches or organisations with whom they might work.
LSM communities are interdependent. They think of themselves as part of the one, holy, catholic and apostolic church. They are therefore in a mutually accountable relationship with other churches and with the denominations to which they belong. This means that they will honour their traditions and work within denominational rules and expectations.
Each LSM community will engage with the continuing development of ministry in
5. Collaborative Leadership
In a Local Shared Ministry community everyone is involved in decision making and every voice must be heard. Local Shared Ministry communities recognise that God’s voice is often found in the most unlikely of places and the Spirit can speak through each and every person.
Only a few members may be natural leaders or be particularly articulate. Many people may be happy to be led, but the Spirit is at work in each person and God often chooses to speak through people who are unwilling, shy or uncertain.
This means that those who have positions as ‘designated leaders’ must always seek to find new ways of including more people in discussions, and ensuring that everyone can have opportunities to lead according to their gifts and calling.
In practice this means that there may be congregational meetings, lots of consultation, good communication systems and that any council or leadership team will seek to facilitate decisions rather than make decisions by themselves.
6. People in LSM Communities
Local Shared Ministry communities do not have one person who they expect to provide ministry, leadership or support. They are not communities gathered around a minister (or ministers) but ministering communities. In order to achieve this, there are a range of people who have particular roles or callings:
Members: The contributions of each and every member are valued, supported and resourced, whether their ministry be in the Church or in the world. In a Local Shared Ministry community you might expect to see people prayed for when they start new jobs or take on roles in the community. Ministry is seen as an ever developing call (see Responding to God's Call)
Specific Ministries: Some members of an LSM community may be given clearly defined roles or authorised for specific tasks. There will be a wide range of different ministries, ranging from administrative tasks to sacramental service. Some of these roles will require people to be elected, selected or appointed. Some people will need to be trained, authorised or ordained in a formal way.
LSM communities celebrate diversity and recognise that each member has a different, equally valuable and complementary contribution to make.
Sacramental Ministers: There will be individuals in the community who are set aside to baptise, preside at Holy Communion or exercise an official diaconal or priestly ministry. These individuals will need to be ordained and authorised by a denomination.
Some of these individuals will be non-stipendiary ministers, trained and ordained elsewhere but appointed to serve as part of the local team. Alternatively, some may be paid or stipendiary ministers who are appointed to work with the community.
In practice, however, it is hoped that a number of priests or 'sacramental ministers' will be called out from the local community and then trained and ordained to serve within the community to which they belong. (Unfortunately, this is not possible at the moment for all of our denominations.)
Professional Ministers: The term 'profession' refers to an occupation, vocation or high-status career, usually involving prolonged academic training, formal qualifications and membership of a professional or regulatory body. Professions involve the application of specialised knowledge of a subject, field, or science, in certain tasks that unqualified (or lay) people cannot ordinarily undertake.
Following this definition, anyone who is an ordained priest or minister is a member of a profession - as are licensed lay ministers or local preachers.
In a Local Shared Ministry community there will therefore be 'professional' ministers but they will work alongside their brothers and sisters who they know are also called to be ministers in the church. Professional status does not necessarily imply a leadership role or indicate that these individuals are expected to put in more time or greater commitment. On the other hand, they do have to relate to their external ‘professional bodies’ and may have particular duties and responsibilities within the Church. These should be exercised with care and in a way that acknowledges the value of each individual.
Although some individuals may be seen as ‘professional’ in a formal sense (and this may include teachers, youth-workers, accountants, doctors, etc…) an LSM community would also expect a degree of professionalism from those who are called to roles within the community.
Paid Ministers: There may well be a number of paid or stipendiary ministers who work with the Local Shared Ministry community. These individuals could be assigned to the community or employed by it. Alternatively, they may work with a number of communities, providing a certain amount of input to each.
This category includes administrators, youth workers and stipendiary ordained ministers. The key difference between Local Shared Ministry and more traditional forms of church is that paid ministers would not be expected to provide the majority of the ministry, but would fulfill very specific and limited roles.
Examples of general roles might include:
Witness: Telling people about Jesus Coordinator: Helping a community to make plans and organize itself Agent: Acting on behalf of God or the Church Resourcer: Creating or making available resources that help the Church in its life and mission | Prophet: Helping people to hear God’s word for them Intercessor: Praying for the needs of the Church and the world Enabler: Helping other people to fulfill their calling Authoriser: Acting on behalf of the Church to approve and empower others in ministry |
More specifically, a stipendiary minister may act primarily as a youth worker, enabler or pastoral worker, rather than attempt to do everything as the 'leader' or 'minister' of the church. An individual may be paid to coordinate the work of the church or act on its behalf in schools, residential homes, or in the local shopping centre.
Paid ministry is valuable, because it enables the church to release people for particular tasks or make particular skills or expertise available in a way that would not be possible with volunteers alone. The important thing to note is that volunteer ministry should not be seen as an alternative to paid ministry, but that paid ministry is used to resource, supplement or empower voluntary ministry.
Supervision: Each LSM community needs someone to act as supervisor. This person would get to know them well and act as the main link between the community and the denominational authorities.
This person would help the community to manage their activities and resources, ensuring that good practice is followed and that clear vision and strategy is established.
This person will support the community when they face particular challenges and will be the first port of call for difficult questions. He or she will be available to the community as a listening ear and an understanding heart.
This person will act as mediator between the community and the wider church, and will also help to resolve conflicts between individuals and groups.
This person will help the community to identify needs for further training and education. He or she will also act to ensure that access to training and education is provided.
The identity of the ‘supervisor’ may vary in each case. He or she will normally be an ordained minister or a denominational officer, e.g. the Circuit Superintendant or Area Dean. It may be possible for the supervisor to be a member of the local team but we would not recommend this.
In the first pilot project the supervisor was the Anglican Area Dean, who acted as ‘priest in charge’. In a multi-church partnership one of the ministry team may take on this role. In some settings a minister from another parish or church may be used.
It is important that everyone involved is clear about the role of the supervisor and that there is agreement about the timing of meetings, reviews and formal contact.
Companion: We recommend that each LSM community should have a ‘companion’ who will get to know the community and help them reflect on their story, structures and practice of ministry. The purpose of having a companion is to encourage mutual learning and spread good practice. Companions must be members of the LSM project group and are expected to follow a mentoring model. This involves:
- Active listening
- Observation
- Encouragement
- Support
- Challenging assumptions
- Pointing out possibilities
- Negotiating plans and objectives
- Modeling collaborative ministry
Companions should be reliable, approachable, non-judgmental and realistic.
In each instance, the nomination of a specific companion will be negotiated between the community, the project group and any participating denominations. The project group will act as the mutual supervision group for companions who will report in at each meeting of the group.
7. LSM Schemes
LSM projects must be negotiated and authorised by the appropriate denominational/ecumenical bodies. This means that churches and communities who are interested in exploring Local Shared Ministry must negotiate this with their denominational and ecumenical bodies and parters before the project can become an official LSM community. The Project Group has the responsibility for coordinating this negotiation and ensuring that an appropriate scheme in created.
An LSM scheme includes agreements about supervision, deployment, funding, and the provision of a companion. It would be normal for such a scheme to inaugurated as a commissioning service at which a public covenant is made.
LSM is a journey not a destination
Local Shared Ministry is fundamentally about discipleship rather than structures. We therefore expect communities to continue learning as they seek to follow Christ. No LSM community will therefore "arrive" at its destination but will continue to develop and change.
The communities, the denominations and the project group will continue to reflect on theology and experience as they seek to develop better ways to support and empower ministry. Reflection, review and rethinking are central to the pursuit of Local Share Ministry in
Tuesday, 7 October 2008
Tuesday
Sainsburys opening
Work with Yvonne Yates at Oakhill to review her time here and talk about a new job description
Lunch with Phil Wason to catch up
Local Shared Ministry Project Group - looking at priorities, professionalism and promotion...
Ecumenical Pastoral and Sponsoring Body with discussions about the Mission Partnership Review, ecumenical confirmations, and more...
Up late trying to write a new job description for an Oakhill chaplain...
Not much time for blogging - sorry
Monday, 6 October 2008
LSM in Water Eaton
It was a very encouraging morning. It's clear that St Frideswide has grown in depth and in numbers during the past eighteen months as it has transitioned from a "priest led" parish to a "ministering community". There is a lot of energy and confidence in the community which is wonderful to see. Peter and Wendy, the asociate priests, are also keen to say that they feel welcomed and relaxed and free to be priests rather than burdened by heavy expectations.
This is the first review of one of our LSM pilots and it confirms what I have come to believe - that local ministry flourishes when space is created.
Well done St Frideswide's!
Friday, 26 September 2008
Relevant?
At Greenbelt I was struck by the comment that we need to deal with the questions that people are actually asking - and these questions often appear through mass media. Hence, some of the more interesting Greenbelt seminars (at least for me) dealt with film and television: Lost, Doctor Who, etc... I came away with a new sense that my interest in popular culture should find a place in my "professional" communications...
During my sabbatical I was struck a number of times by the discord between church life and daily life. Churches should support their members in ordinary life, rather than draw them out from reality. After the welcome for some new ministers in Milton Keynes, a colleague and I reflected on the way our public focus on clergy effectively devalues the ministry of all members. I am feeling the need to find ways of reversing this process...
As I continue to reflect on the global economic situation I am concerned that a sensible and realistic but visionary voice needs to be heard. The social order we have constructed since the industrial revolution is slowly destroying the planet and we are facing a major change of direction. Big businesses and politicians find it easier to talk about "business as usual" but it would be more sensible to take a long cold look at reality and put in place policies for significant but steady change...
...and that's before we take account of some of the other issues of justice, peace and the integrity of creation...
Oddly enough, the Local Shared Ministry Project and the difficulties posed by deanery finance and deployment give me huge reasons for hope. The unsustainable models of church and ministry which were set up when Milton Keynes was founded have been on the rocks for a while now and a number of us have set out to develop more collaborative and sustainable approaches. This may sound like moving deckchairs on the Titanic or a desperate attempt to find ways to survive, but I think our attempts to build sustainable Christian community will help us develop ways to encourage sustainable human community. A genuine local shared ministry community could be a sign of hope for the whole world...
When I said I had a vision for a sustainable, growing church, I was criticised by a good friend for using the word "sustainable" - but I increasingly believe that this word "sustainable" is central to what the Church could offer to a commercially dependent, consumerist society - such as we find in MK.
This has not been an "angry rant". I recognised long ago that the Gospel is not just about the "spiritual" world, but is for all creation. Hence, we are called to proclaim freedom to prisoners and good news to the poor, to be good stewards in creation and to continually expand the circle of hope.
But how do we do this? Can Sunday Church, such as we have it in MK, create space for deep reflection and engagement on these issues? If we have "seeker" sensitive services, can we also debate homosexuality, economic theory or community development? And if we can't what do we actualy have to contribute to this world?
I don't think I've got an answer here. As a pneumatological democrat and a believer in collective decision-making, I'm extremely warry of standing up in church and expressing a personal opinion, since I'm not sure I actually have the right - particulalry if there is no room for debate. Traditional forms of church encourage a didactic approach, but challenging issues are better dealt with by communities. Which brings me back to Rolland Allen's "tell it to the church" and the reflection that leaders can only impose short term "truth".
In order to deal with some of these tricky issues we need forms of church that create space for debate, and enable us to engage with real life. For many of us, traditional church just can't do this. On Thursday night I met with some of our worship leaders for a time of reflection. On these occasions, we often find ourselves saying that we don't give ourselves time for deep reflection, but get bogged down in commities and activities which often drain our energies. Oh for a church where this is not the case!
I agree with Tim Leeson's rant and would happily have written it myself, but I think the answer is closely related to the issue of how we do church. Can the "emerging church" do better?
Tuesday, 19 August 2008
Back to the evenings...
Thursday, 7 August 2008
8. Local Ministry
At the end of my sabbatical I simply want to reflect that local / mutual / shared / total / collaborative forms of ministry are absolutely key for the future of the church and that I will continue to prioritise this area of work over the years ahead.
Wednesday, 9 July 2008
Local Shared Ministry
Monday, 7 July 2008
Oxford Meetings
I met with Beren to discuss Local Shared Ministry. We spent some time reflecting on the past two years of the LSM project in MK and thought a bit about the wider picture. We brainstormed on the theme of the different groups who are key to the debate and made a list of neccesary culture changes:
From Pyramids to Circles
From Delegation to Gift-led
From Volunteering to Calling
From Miniter Centred to Jesus Centred
From Exodus 18 to 1 Corinthians 12
From Control to Empowerment
From Community gathered around a Minister to Ministering Community
From Minister as Theologian to People as Theologians
We're spent some time thinking of possible strategies to promote such culture change. All good stuff...
This was followed by the Fresh Expressions Oversight Group at which we planned the February Vision Day, a gathering for practitioners and a series of leaflets...
A fairly busy day for a sabbatical...
Saturday, 28 June 2008
The Healthy Churches' Handbook

The material in this book has been around for a while and has become fairly influential. This felt like a good time to re-read it.
Put briefly the argument is that churches grow (towards wholeness) when they exhibit seven key characteristics or marks:
- Energised by faith
- Outward-looking focus
- Seeks to find out what God wants
- Faces the cost of change and growth
- Operates as a community
- Makes room for all
- Does a few things and does them well
Healthy Churches has been on my mind for a number of reasons:
1. Back in 2005 we suggested that parishes use Natural Church Development (a similar but more expensive project), Healthy Churches, or some other mechanism as a way to encourage development. This was part of our Deanery Plan - and we set aside money for it! It's odd that no single church took the money or gave it a go. Why? As we start the deanery planning process up again is there some way we can learn from the past and incorporate this more fully in our thinking? What would be required?
2. In his new vision, Sharing Life plus, bishop John also mentions Natural Church Development and Healthy Churches. This concept is clearly back on the agenda.
3. The LSM Project Group is thinking of developing a system of companions/mentors who work with communities who are working towards LSM. There is a reasonable overlap between the intention of the companions and the ideals of Healthy Churches. The Handbook has a lot to say about the need for fascilitators, which I found helpful in my thinking, particulalry in its' discussion about training. Robert Warren suggests minimal raining with ongoing support and mutual reflection. This may be helful for us in our thinking...
Bringing all this together I wonder if there might be a place for Healthy Churches within the new Deanery Plan and whether the LSM Project Group might incorporate it as part of its development work... What do you think?
Thursday, 12 June 2008
Mutual Ministry in Bristol
I met with a very interesting man called Alister Palmer who is working in one of the estates in South Bristol where he's doing some really interesting work with "transformation" - particularaly with the non-church community.
He was instrumental in setting up Enabler Supported Ministry in Tasmania with a group of six (now nine) congregations, and has recently been back to review the life of these communities as part of a sabbatical. He was particulalry interested in looking at the missionarly life of these communities (which he thinks is developing) and at their leadership. I've already seen the first draft of his report which is fascinating...
Alongside Alister I also met a group of people, most of whom had been part of a visit to Auckland a couple of years ago to take part in Enabler Training. We had a really good conversation about Mutual Ministry which I hope they found encouraging...
A couple of issues came out of the day. First, there is the whole question of leadership/mission. This visit confirmed my suspicion that the Church of England is currently focussing on a model of leadership which is primarily individualistic, heroic and inspirational - and laying this model on vicars, priests, LLMs etc... who are to be "Leaders in Mission". This tendency has some major weaknesses, not least that it doesn't recognise the richness and diversity of call - the Spirit may have other ideas... It also reafirms the traditional identification of clergy with ministry - if we are to have churches which are thriving as missionary/ministry fellowships we need to encourage collaborative approaches rather than heroic leadership.
I mentioned the book Wikinomics which I've been rereading recently - "How mass colaboration changes everything". As churches we often think that we need to learn the "command and control" techniques of business, when, in fact, there are people in the business world who are promosting and exploring a very different way of doing things... There was a rich strand in this conversation about chaos theory, self-organisation and collaboration. Some interesting stuff here...
The second lesson I took away from today was the need to do more work on helping people to understand the underlying theology of collaborative/mutual/local shared ministry. The Bristol group were plunged into enabler training in Auckland without first taking part in the AMEND course which is normally used in NZ to introduce the concept to members/ministers etc...
This fits in with some of my recent reading, e.g Thew Forrester's "I have called you friends..." and David Robertson's very helpful book, "Collaborative Ministry". Both of these contain some very deep and moving theology, which is probably needs to be grapled with before people can begin thinking and acting in a collaborative way. I've begun toying with the idea of a short course which I'm going to propose to the LSM Project Group...
We all agreed that this had been a good day and we'd like to keep the link alive. Maybe "mass colaboration" will help us all...
So back to MK and time for a bit of sleep...
Tuesday, 10 June 2008
"I have called you friends..."
This is a wonderful little book by the Ministry Development Coordinator for the Diocese of North Michigan. It tells the story of Mutual Ministry in North Michigan (briefly) but also explores some of the underlying thought. He borrows heavily from feminist theology, and picks up Walt Winks' concept of "domination". He also hints at choas and organisation theory, implying that order emerges from chaos through a process of self-organisation. Hence church leaders should resist the temptation to impose order, since a liberated community will generate more creativity...
Although he does have a lot to say about the practicalities of Mutual Ministry, this is not a "how to" manual, so much as a "why do" introduction. Thew Forrester acknowledges that Mutual Ministry became possible to meet the needs of small rural communities, but sets out a strong and enthusiastic case for change based on a Christ-centred call for justice. Patriarchy and dominion are overcome by mutuality and awareness...
I liked this book, but recognise that the flow of his thought may not be to everyone's taste. Some of our more thoughtful reflector -theorists would probably love it, but some of my colleagues would wonder what he was talking about...
Jesus said, "I have called you friends..." Kevin Ther Forrester, would like to show us how to turn clerical domination structures into the kin-dom of heaven. Amen to that!